{"id":115023,"date":"2021-11-02T15:57:21","date_gmt":"2021-11-02T19:57:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/webapp2.wright.edu\/web1\/newsroom\/?p=115023"},"modified":"2022-09-28T10:16:24","modified_gmt":"2022-09-28T14:16:24","slug":"fighting-words","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/webapp2.wright.edu\/web1\/newsroom\/2021\/11\/02\/fighting-words\/","title":{"rendered":"Fighting words"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>

C-SPAN’s “Book TV” will tape a book talk on \u201cFirepower: How Weapons Shaped Warfare,\u201d by Paul Lockhart, professor of history at Wright State, on Nov. 5. (Photo by Erin Pence)<\/p><\/div>\n

It features a colorful introduction on the 1522 battle of Bicocca north of Milan, Italy, which pitted Swiss army mercenaries armed with spears against the Spanish-Imperial army brandishing gunpowder firearms.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt was said that the first ranks of the pikemen, officers among them, simply melted into the ground, falling as one in the face of that terrible volley. \u2026After Bicocca, there was no going back. The age of the gun was underway.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Thus begins \u201cFirepower: How Weapons Shaped Warfare<\/a>,\u201d a new book by Paul Lockhart, Ph.D., professor of history<\/a> at Wright State University, that is generating buzz and media interest.<\/p>\n

C-SPAN is coming to Wright State on Nov. 5 to record a \u201cbook talk\u201d discussion of the book by Lockhart for its “Book TV” program, which has featured such authors as Tom Clancy and David Mamet.<\/p>\n

Lockhart’s book discussion, sponsored by the College of Liberal Arts and the University Libraries, will be held in Millett Hall at 3:30 p.m. The program was organized by Crystal Lake, Ph.D., professor of English language and literatures.<\/p>\n

Lockhart has also discussed \u201cFirepower\u201d on podcasts, and several publications are planning book reviews.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe book is about how the evolution of weapons technology changed not only the way that armies fight and navies fight, but also actually managed to define the modern state and the international order,\u201d said Lockhart.<\/p>\n

Lockhart traces his interest in military weaponry to his paternal grandmother. She was employed in 1912 at an armory by the Remington Arms Company, an American manufacturer of firearms and ammunition.<\/p>\n

\u201cShe was working for Remington during World War I. I had early exposure to the history of firearms through her,\u201d Lockhart said. \u201cIt interested me that so many histories don\u2019t take into account the transformative power of firearms.\u201d<\/p>\n

In teaching military history over the past 15 years, Lockhart also focuses on the history of technology. But his encyclopedic knowledge of weapons history goes back much further.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is the fruit of 40-plus years of research on my own,\u201d he said. \u201cI don\u2019t think I could have written this book without having worked on it in my head kind of unintentionally for a couple of decades.\u201d<\/p>\n

Lockhart is the author of seven single-author books on the role of war in history, including \u201cThe Drillmaster of Valley Forge\u201d and \u201cThe Whites of Their Eyes.\u201d<\/p>\n

Readers of the 624-page \u201cFirepower,\u201d published by Basic Books, will likely include those interested in the history of war, security policy and international relations.<\/p>\n

\u201cOne of the big themes is how the sophistication of military technologies reduced the number of great powers,\u201d said Lockhart. \u201cFewer states had the wherewithal to keep up with the growing sophistication of weapons.\u201d<\/p>\n

This from \u201cFirepower\u201d on how the increased killing power of firearms in the 18th century changed battlefield tactics:<\/p>\n

\u201cArtillery rose in importance, cavalry diminished, infantry ruled the battlefield, and tactical units became longer and thinner. Generating firepower was no longer the exclusive province of specialist troops; firepower was now the focal point of tactics.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

There is a fascinating passage on the limited effectiveness of the rifle-musket during the Civil War. Riflemen had to elevate the musket to hit more distant targets, creating a safe zone in between because of the bullet\u2019s trajectory.<\/p>\n

\u201cA man standing midrange, in this case at 150 yards, would be perfectly safe, even if the rifle-musket seemed to be aimed straight at him: the bullet would travel well over his head.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Lockhart also details the birth of the machine gun, invented by Hiram Maxim in the basement of his London home.<\/p>\n

\u201cSix rounds blasted out in rapid succession, six empty brass cases flew out of the weapon and bounced, clanging metallically, on the floor \u2014 with only one squeeze of the trigger. And with that simple and successful experiment in 1883, the nature of the battlefield, of military firearms, and of firepower itself changed forever.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

There are also sections and references to hand grenades, mortars, bazookas, torpedoes, flamethrowers, poison gas and even the Colt-Browning \u201cpotato digger\u201d machine gun.<\/p>\n

Lockhart writes that the gun finally took a back seat in the development of military technology with the atomic bombings of Japan that brought an end to World War II.<\/p>\n

\u201cFirearms were, and are, no longer the focal point of weapons engineering; they are no longer carefully guarded state secrets the way they once were; they no longer precipitate panicked arms races. Not unimportant by any stretch, but not nearly so central to organized violence as they once were.\u201d <\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

C-SPAN’s “Book TV” will tape a book talk on \u201cFirepower: How Weapons Shaped Warfare,\u201d by Paul Lockhart, professor of history at Wright State, on Nov. 5. Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":115059,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[722,729,725,4863,747,715,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-115023","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-academics","category-around-campus","category-home-news-sidebar","category-humanities-and-cultural-studies","category-liberal-arts","category-news","category-research"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/webapp2.wright.edu\/web1\/newsroom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115023","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/webapp2.wright.edu\/web1\/newsroom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/webapp2.wright.edu\/web1\/newsroom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webapp2.wright.edu\/web1\/newsroom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webapp2.wright.edu\/web1\/newsroom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=115023"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/webapp2.wright.edu\/web1\/newsroom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115023\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":115067,"href":"https:\/\/webapp2.wright.edu\/web1\/newsroom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115023\/revisions\/115067"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webapp2.wright.edu\/web1\/newsroom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/115059"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/webapp2.wright.edu\/web1\/newsroom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=115023"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webapp2.wright.edu\/web1\/newsroom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=115023"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webapp2.wright.edu\/web1\/newsroom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=115023"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}